Monty Hall Problem and Mediation

The Monty Hall problem is named for its similarity to the Let’s Make a Deal television game show hosted by Monty Hall. The problem is stated as follows. Assume that a room is equipped with three doors. Behind two are goats, and behind the third is a shiny new car. You are asked to pick a door and will win whatever is behind it. Let’s say you pick door 1. Before the door is opened, however, someone who knows what’s behind the doors (Monty Hall) opens one of the other two doors, revealing a goat, and asks you if you wish to change your selection to the third door (i.e., the door which neither you picked nor he opened). The Monty Hall problem is deciding whether you do.

The correct answer is that you do want to switch. If you do not switch, you have the expected 1/3 chance of winning the car, since no matter whether you initially picked the correct door, Monty will show you a door with a goat. But after Monty has eliminated one of the doors for you, you obviously do not improve your chances of winning to better than 1/3 by sticking with your original choice. If you now switch doors, however, there is a 2/3 chance you will win the car (counterintuitive though it seems).

Here are the key points to understanding the Monty Hall puzzle:

  • Two choices are 50-50 when you know nothing about them
  • Monty helps us by “filtering” the bad choices on the other side. It’s a choice of a random guess and the “Champ door” that’s the best on the other side.
  • In general, more information means you re-evaluate your choices.

The fatal flaw in the Monty Hall paradox is not considering Monty’s filtering, thinking the chances are the same before and after. But the goal isn’t to understand this puzzle — it’s to realize how subsequent actions & information challenge previous decisions.

Mediation is one of the modern dispute-resolution systems. It gives a chance to parties to settle their conflicts with the help of the mediator. It’s crucial to understand that our perception of the conflict could be wrong. Because of this, as the Monty Hall Problem reveals we should always consider shifting our perception and questioning ourselves. New conditions, evidence, etc. should be taken into account. Counterintuitive though it seems, generally changing our decisions would be beneficial for us.

[contact-form-7 id=”7″ title=”Contact form 1″]

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like these